June 20, 2007

The Nativity: A Hollywood Disaster

I wonder if the makers of The Nativity are wondering why their movie wasn’t the hit that The Passion was. Maybe. And the answer is so easy.

I just sat down and watched the movie for the first time on DVD – as the parents of four children, my wife and I don’t make it to the theater often. And frankly, I had been warned somewhat that the contents were problematic. However, I didn’t expect the movie to be as wrong as it was. And I do mean wrong.

I think a scene at the start of the movie helps to illustrate my feelings. Before Mary is betrothed, her father Joachim is apparently having trouble with the tax collectors who take his donkey. So a friend gives Mary back a donkey and asks her to tell her father that the Tax Collectors left it behind. This way, he reasons, Joachim will be able to keep his pride.

There’s so many things wrong with that scene, but what really bothered me is that Mary apparently agreed to lie to her father. To keep his pride in tact. Is this really the person God would choose to be His Mother? Not by a long shot.

And the problems with the movie continue from silly errors, like the Wise Men showing up the night of Jesus’ birth, to the offensive, like Mary’s attitude toward Joseph when they are first betrothed. If you’re going to backfill a story like this, why not backfill with the rich tradition surrounding the story of Jesus’ birth? And why not go for accuracy? Mel Gibson was rewarded financially for attempting to be as accurate as possible – and for building a story from the point of view of the believer. This story was built to entertain and even those tidbits meant to make the movie more dramatic were ridiculous: Mary attacked by a snake in the river, for example.

Ultimately, if you’re going to tell a story like this and get believers to watch, you need to have a believer writing the story. From what I’ve read, the writers and producers of this movie don’t attend any church and simply consider themselves “spiritual.” Surprise: the movie reflects this lack of commitment both to the Bible story and to the beauty of Jesus’ birth. What a shame: this movie could have been excellent, but instead was a waste of time. It was designed for those who don’t know the story and aren’t really concerned about the theology behind it.

My recommendation: don’t waste your time. And if you take others to see it, be sure to explain why it’s wrong afterwards.


God bless,
Jay

Posted by Jay at June 20, 2007 07:55 AM | TrackBack

Comments

I haven't seen 'The Nativity Story' but only the trailer that I was sent. It looked authentic - from the point of view of scenes and clothing etc.

I accept your comments re Mary and the donkey and the Magi arriving early. But the trailer did mention that the writer/producer had asked his Pastor to pray about the project and the church members had been doing so. There was also a Jewish, Catholic and Protestant advisors to offer comments. I am surprised there was nothing positive to say about the movie.

I cannot agree that Mel Gibson's movie was more historically or biblically accurate. Most critics agree that the scourging was overdone - and is certainly not given this emphasis in the Gospels. He also added a lot of devotional bits and pieces - I gather from Bl Catherine Emmeric's visions of the Passion. These I found detracted from the authenticity of the presentation.

Ultimately it is impossible to portray sacred themes perfectly on screen and to everyone's satisfaction. Books and religious art can't do it either. Our safest bet is to remain with the Scriptures. But the various other attempts can sometimes help.We should give those who try them the benefit of the doubt.

Blessings, Fr Ronan.

Posted by: Fr Ronan Kilgannon at June 26, 2007 08:07 AM

Fr Ronan,

Do you mean to say that even with a Catholic advisor helping, they still portray the sinless virgin as a rebellious and resentful teen?

I can understand when Protestants get this one wrong, but do Catholics have this messed up as well? Or are you suggesting the Catholic advice went unheeded?

Posted by: Burnt Marshwiggle at June 27, 2007 11:22 AM

Post a comment











Remember personal info?






 
The Bloggers
Danny Young married Catholic
Jay Baptist convert
Joe Cradle Catholic

Categories
Recent Comments
On Robin Williams shows his Ignorance
Charlie Doe
said:
The Catholic church has known of its pedophile priests for about 1600 years and has hidden it from v... [read more]


On Prayer Requests
mike
said:
Urgent pray for my friend Cher ---she has lost her job, is very bitter, and leading a very destructi... [read more]


On Is it a Sin to miss Church on Sunday?
benny
said:
If the people of the Catholic church did not write the Bible then who did?Yes, you would say the ear... [read more]


On Legalize pedophilia? It's on the way . . .
Cindy
said:
A good book sold by Angelus Press on this subject: Dr. Bogomir Kuhar's booklet Infant Homicid... [read more]


On Confession and the Bible: Understanding God’s Will
benny
said:
benny here; do you know jay? if so what is his last name? OR jay if you are reading this,what is y... [read more]


On Secrets of the Bible
Matthew
said:
Chris, So basically you are infallible in your reading and interpretation of Scripture, understandin... [read more]


On Is The Catholic Church The Antichrist? Inquiring Minds Want To Know...
benny
said:
To winstanley: If the Catholic Church is the anti-christ why are there so many people,including you... [read more]


On 2008 Presidential Candidates on Abortion
Joel
said:
Bob, Obama isn't an ex-Muslim in any meaningful sense. He may have had the tag as a small child, but... [read more]


On Election 2008: Presidential Candidates on Social Issues
when we were one
said:
Jay I definitely think embryonic stem cell research needs to be on the table. Huck and Paul are t... [read more]


On What’s the point of Godparents? The Role of the Godmother and Godfather
Burnt Marshwiggle
said:
Nicole, Are you Catholic? If neither you nor the parents are Catholic, then I do not know of any re... [read more]


Communities
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.