September 23, 2004

The Supreme Branch Rules Again: Schiavo Should Die

Today we have another example of our judicial system gone mad: The Florida Supreme Court ruled that Terri's Law was unconstitutional. This is fascinating from a legal perspective:


The unanimous court said the law that kept Terri Schiavo alive violated the separation of powers between the judicial branch and the legislative and executive branches.

Now, I'm no legal expert, but I thought the only oversight of the judicial branch of goverment was legislative power to write laws. The judges seem to be suggesting that you cannot overturn a judicial fiat through normal lawmaking. This seems perverse and scary (judges, after all, cannot be removed from the bench easily).

And somewhere in this mess, Michael Schiavo finally gets to kill his wife so he can keep the insurance money. It's a shame that he isn't willing to simply turn her over to her parents (who have been fighting for her right-to-live for years) and continue his new life with his new wife/fiance/whatever (she'd better hope she stays healthy!).

Much prayer is needed - especially considering the direction our courts have taken in recent years.

God bless,
Jay

Posted by Jay at September 23, 2004 3:22 PM | TrackBack

Comments

Jay,

It supposed to work like this. If the Court has based its opinion on the constitution then it would take a constitutional amendment in order to change the opinion . . . or a later Court ruling modifying or reversing. The legislature cannot do anything about it otherwise. Of course the Courts are supposed to interpret the law from the original intent of the writers, not create new law based on the court's whim (This is called "judical legistlation" and is illegitimate law. ie Roe v. Wade et al) . . . At least that is how it is suppose to work.

In Christ,

Thomas

Posted by: Thomas at September 23, 2004 4:29 PM

Thanks for the correction, Thomas!

Posted by: Jay at September 23, 2004 4:50 PM

We, that is, people who are in no way affiliated with Terri should not have any say as to whether she is allowed to die with dignity or continue living. On EXTRA tonight they will be interviewing celebrities as if their opinion matters one iota. I feel very sorry for Terri as she can't begin to understand what is going on now seeing as her mental functioning is limited to the base functions of the cerebral cortex. I know I would want to die at this point because my mind is all I really have, but like I said, it is intrusive and insensitive to think that we have any right to tell the families what to do... I have read that Terri herself would have wanted to be taken off of life support if this event happened, and unless that information is apocryphal (which, I concede, it could well be) her wishes should be carried out.

Christ be with you,
Anon

Posted by: Joey at March 22, 2005 6:03 PM

I have a brief statement/question. Is it not against Gods wishes for man to intervene and alter Gods plan? We must remember that Mary Schiavo would have already joined the Lord in Heaven had it not been for the feeding tube. God has a plan and has called Mary to him for 15 years. Man should not stand in the way or alter such plans.

In The Lord,

Rog

Posted by: rog at March 22, 2005 8:07 PM

Post a comment











Remember personal info?






 
The Bloggers
Danny Young married Catholic
Jay Baptist convert
Joe Cradle Catholic

Categories
Recent Comments
On Prayer Requests
Michael Leonard Rowley
said:
Please pray for Christ, And please answer all his prayers. He suffers much, for all of us, and I wor... [read more]


On Practical Reality: The Church and Faith
Michael Leonard Rowley
said:
This is an argument about who is special in the 'eyes' of Christ, and that is a judgment reserved fo... [read more]


On Priestly Celibacy: Why Can't Catholic Priests Get Married?
Andres
said:
HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN ALL THIS THEN?? 1 Timothy 3 Qualifications of Overseers 1 This is a faithful sa... [read more]


On "Outside the Church there is no salvation"
Matthew
said:
Benny, You are still not getting the MAJOR difference between infallibility and IMPECCABILITY. You... [read more]


On Is The Catholic Church The Antichrist? Inquiring Minds Want To Know...
Joseph
said:
Hi all. Its Joseph again. I'm sorry I have not been posting, the reason being I felt like I was gett... [read more]


On Jehovah Witnesses and the 144,000 Elect: A Catholic Response
joe
said:
I too have a friend who is a Jehovah Witness and have heard about their belief on the resurrection ... [read more]


On Pope John Paul coming back to say hi?
skelly
said:
Mwangi, Most of us who post on this site are sincerely concerned with seeking and/or sharing the tru... [read more]


On What is the purpose of the Vatican?
Matthew
said:
Jen, Can you be a little more specific in your question? Thanks. Matthew... [read more]


On Stubbornness and Christian Witness
Matthew
said:
Habib, Here are two links that you should have in case you are unable to contact a Catholic Priest: ... [read more]


On President Bush and Africa
Gayle
said:
Hi: I think President Bush is a very good President, I know in my heart he has tried to protect the... [read more]


Communities
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.